Legal Opinion

North Point Patio Offices Venture v. United Benefit Life Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 10, 1984No. A14-82-819CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRAUGHN, Justice.

North Point Patio Offices Venture (North Point) appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of United Benefit Life Insurance Co. (United Benefit). The sole issue is whether the so-called “due on sale” clause (alternatively referred to as an optional acceleration clause) contained in a deed of trust between North Point and United Benefit constitutes an unreasonable restraint on the alienation of property. The “due on sale” clause provides for optional acceleration of the entire indebtedness by United Benefit if North Point sells the mortgaged property to a third…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sonny Arnold, Inc. v. Sentry Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Mattern v. HerzogTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Crestview, Ltd. v. Foremost Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Nabours, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meisler v. Republic of Texas Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Parker Plaza West Partners, a Texas General Partnership v. Unum Pension and Insurance Company, F/k/a Union Mutual Pension and Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. In Re MullinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
  4. Village of Riverdale v. Nosmo KingsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API