Legal Opinion

Cervino v. Coratti

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 11, 1945PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.

The appeal is from the denial of a motion to set aside the verdict and from the judgment. Many of the assignments of error are improperly taken and others find no support in the record. The record contains no evidence upon which the denial of the motion to set aside the verdict may be tested, nor is the denial of a motion for nonsuit or a motion for a directed verdict properly assignable as error. Doolittle v. Otis Elevator Co., 98 Conn. 248, 249, 118 Atl. 818; Callahan v. Jursek, 100 Conn. 490, 492, 124 Atl. 31.

The defendants state in their brief that they rely upon three defenses to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WadeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  2. Linahan v. LinahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  3. Sickmund v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Richmond Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  5. Callahan v. JursekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. VennardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  2. Cross v. HuttenlocherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Mickel v. New England Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. Kaplan v. Mashkin Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Kileen v. General Motors CorporationConnecticut Superior Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API