Kaplan v. Mashkin Freight Lines, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The defendants in this action for negligence have appealed from a judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict for the plaintiff. They assign error in the denial of their motion to set the verdict aside, in rulings concerning the use of medical treatises in the direct and cross examination of expert medical witnesses and the argument to the jury, and in the finding. The defendants admitted liability and the case was tried on the issue of damages only.
A summary of the finding, with certain corrections, follows: The plaintiff, who at the time of the accident was fifty-nine years old, claimed to have…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- State v. GannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- State v. NicolosiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- State v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cross v. HuttenlocherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Patch v. Stanley WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Ames v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Perez v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- City & County of Honolulu v. Bishop Trust Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.