Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Mashkin Freight Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 15, 1959PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The defendants in this action for negligence have appealed from a judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict for the plaintiff. They assign error in the denial of their motion to set the verdict aside, in rulings concerning the use of medical treatises in the direct and cross examination of expert medical witnesses and the argument to the jury, and in the finding. The defendants admitted liability and the case was tried on the issue of damages only.

A summary of the finding, with certain corrections, follows: The plaintiff, who at the time of the accident was fifty-nine years old, claimed to have…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  2. State v. GannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  3. State v. WadeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  4. State v. NicolosiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  5. State v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cross v. HuttenlocherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Patch v. Stanley WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. Ames v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  4. Perez v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  5. City & County of Honolulu v. Bishop Trust Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API