Legal Opinion · Dissent

St. Margaret Memorial Hospital v. Borough Council of Aspinwall

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1994Published

1DissentPellegrini, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I would hold that the distinction between permitting off-site accessory uses attendant to a main use located in the Borough of Aspinwall (Borough) and not permitting such accessory uses while the main use is not located in the Borough is a rational one. I would also hold the Borough’s zoning ordinance not to be exclusionary.

St. Margaret Memorial Hospital (Hospital) filed an application with the Borough for permission to operate a parking lot as accessory parking for employee and/or patient vehicles. While the proposed parking lot is in the Borough, the Hospital itself…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lumber, Production & Industrial Workers Local 2362 v. WondzellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Kavanagh v. London Grove TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Kavanagh v. London Grove TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Fun Bun, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API