Legal Opinion

Citizens State Bank v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 1929No. 27,162PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Appeal by defendant from the judgment.

Defendant issued to plaintiff its fidelity bond or contract to pay to plaintiff any loss which it might sustain by reason of the dishonesty, fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation, or any other dishonest or criminal act or omission of plaintiff’s employes, among others D. D. Clark, its president. The bond provides:

That the defendant company “hereby binds itself to pay to Citizens State Bank of St. Paul, Minnesota, as Employers, such pecuniary loss as the Employer shall sustain of money or other personal property (including that for which the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Liberty State Bank v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Prior Lake State Bank v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. City of Burlington v. Western Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. RBC Dain Rauscher, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Swedish Methodist Aid Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API