Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Drug Plastics & Glass Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 27, 1995No. 93-1013Published

1ConcurrenceRogers, Circuit Judge

On rehearing, the court reaffirms that the appropriate time for determining the requisite relatedness of the complaint and charge allegations is at the time the complaint is filed. In so doing, the court also emphasizes the perils for the Board of relying on boilerplate language, albeit this time with regard to the complaint in addition to the charge. Cf. Lotus Suites, Inc. v. NLRB, 32 F.3d 588, 592 (D.C.Cir.1994); G.W. Galloway Co. v. NLRB, 856 F.2d 275, 278 (D.C.Cir.1988). Absent allegations on the face of the complaint that make apparent their factual relationship to the allegations in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. G.W. Galloway Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  2. Lotus Suites, Inc., D/B/A Embassy Suites Resort v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  3. Drug Plastics & Glass Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API