Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Services v. Maximillian K.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 2003No. C041382PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HULL, J.

Appellants, the mother and father of the minors, appeal from the order of the juvenile court terminating their parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 366.26, 395; further undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) Appellants contend the juvenile court erred when it conducted the section 366.26 hearing without ensuring compliance with the notice provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). (25 U.S.C. § 1902 et seq.) We affirm the order.

Facts and Procedural History

The Sacramento County Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) filed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re M.C.P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. In re J.T.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. Tracey v. GaboriaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Shahida R.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Ivy B.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Kristina C.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Kern County Department of Human Services v. S.N.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Jonathan G.California Court of Appeal · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API