Legal Opinion

Reddy v. Mueller

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 7, 2008No. C07-03925 HRLPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REMAND

HOWARD R. LLOYD, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendants’ motion to remand the case is scheduled for a hearing on March 18, 2007. 1 However, this matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument and so that hearing is now VACATED. Civil Local Rule 7 — 1(b).

I.BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Harsha Reddy has been a lawful permanent resident of the United States since 1980. Quizon Decl. ¶ 12. He applied for naturalization on February 27, 2006 and was interviewed by the United States Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) on July 11, 2006. Id. When he filed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yue Yu v. BrownDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Amir Ahmad Bakhtiary Davijani v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
  2. Banukumar v. MayorkasDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  3. DHONDUP NAMGYAL v. JaddouDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  4. Mohammad Farshchin v. Pamela Bondi, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  5. Payam Delgosha v. Markwayne Mullin, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API