Legal Opinion

Payam Delgosha v. Markwayne Mullin, et al.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 18, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00287Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PAYAM DELGOSHA, Case No. 26-cv-00287-TSH 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULES 12(b)(1) AND 12(b)(6) 10 MARKWAYNE MULLIN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 15 11 Defendants. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Payam Delgosha filed suit against Defendants Kristi Noem, Pamela Jo Bondi, 15 Joseph B. Edlow, and Kash Patel (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging Defendants violated the 16 Administrative Procedure Act and Mandamus Act by failing to adjudicate Delgosha’s Application 17 for…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API