Legal Opinion
Barr v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 1980No. 1-1079A265PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.
Charlee E. Barr, Paul G. Finch and Charles Wm. Rice (hereinafter collectively referred to as Conservation Officers) brought an action against the State of Indiana (State) on behalf of themselves and all other employees similarly situated for the payment of wages for hours that they were required to work on legal holidays. The trial court granted the State's motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
A summary judgment is rendered when after reviewing all the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file along with affidavits and testimony,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hale v. Peabody Coal CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Gonser v. Bd. of Com'rs for Owen Cty.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Board of Directors of Big Raccoon Conservancy District v. Kessler Farms Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Tekulve v. TurnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Palmer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by18 opinions
- Coghill v. BadgerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Scott v. Anderson Newspapers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Baker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Indiana State Highway Commission v. Bates & Rogers Construction, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Carroll v. LordyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.