Legal Opinion

Dollar v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 14, 1957No. 19539, 19549PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Presiding Justice.

1. The defendant having admitted that T. J. Thompson executed the deed in question, and that the deed had been properly recorded, a presumption is raised that the deed was delivered. Henderson v. Kemp, 155 Ga. 489 (117 S. E. 244); Bourquin v. Bourquin, 110 Ga. 440 (35 S. E. 710). To overcome this presumption, the defendant introduced in evidence, over the timely objection of the plaintiffs, an ex parte affidavit which had been executed by Mrs. T. J. Thompson in connection with her application for a year’s support. The affidavit was executed before the Ordinary of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Higgins v. TrenthamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Bourquin v. BourquinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Hollis v. SalesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Blalock v. MilandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Henderson v. KempSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. Virginia Highland Associates, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Whitworth v. WhitworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Bank of Am., N.A. v. Adams (In re Adams)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
  4. Bowman v. Century Funding, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Minor v. RayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API