State ex rel. Schneider v. Kreiner

For the reasons that follow, we deny relator’s request for oral argument and his request for a writ of mandamus.

I

Relator requests oral argument “[i]n the event that the Court finds the decisional process would be aided by oral argument * *

We deny this request because oral argument would not be beneficial to resolution of this appeal. None of the issues raised is so complex that oral argument would assist the court in resolution of this causé. Further, relator has neither established nor argued any factors warranting oral argument here. State ex rel. McGinty v. Cleveland City School Disk Bd.…