Legal Opinion

Voelbel v. Town of Bridgewater

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 21, 1995No. 93-241PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BATCHELDER, J.

The defendant, the Town of Bridgewater (town), appeals the Superior Court’s (Fauver, J.) grant of attorney’s fees to the plaintiff, John Voelbel. We reverse.

Without prior notice, the town selectmen terminated the plaintiff from his position as police chief. In response, the plaintiff sued the town in superior court. See RSA 105:2-a (1990). Following this court’s decision in Johnson v. Nash, 135 N.H. 534, 608 A.2d 200 (1992), the plaintiff moved for summary judgment, arguing that the lack of prior notice of his termination violated New Hampshire’s Right-To-Know…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Silva v. BotschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. Bradbury v. ShawSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  3. Foster v. Town of HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Johnson v. NashSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goode v. New Hampshire Office of the Legislative Budget AssistantSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  2. New Hampshire Challenge, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  3. Voelbel v. Town of BridgewaterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  4. Voelbel v. Town of BridgewaterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API