Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Nash
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 5, 1992No. 91-447PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The defendants, Marshall Nash and Richard Langis, are selectmen for the town of Middleton. They appeal from the Superior Court’s (Dickson, J.) finding that they violated various sections of the New Hampshire Right-to-Know Law, RSA chapter 91-A, when they voted in executive session to dismiss the plaintiff, Jeremy Johnson, as the Middleton Chief of Police. The superior court reinstated the plaintiff to his post with back pay and awarded him attorney fees pursuant to RSA 91-A:8, I. We affirm.
On August 6, 1991, the superior court conducted a temporary hearing in which the parties presented…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- UniFirst Corp. v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Stoneman v. Tamworth School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SmartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Voelbel v. Town of BridgewaterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- McManus v. Cheshire County, NHDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
- Noyes v. Moccia, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999
- Tejasinha Sivalingam v. Frances Newton & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021