State v. Blount
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentDe Muniz, J.
The majority holds that Deputy Oswald had probable cause to arrest defendant for possession of a controlled substance, and thus the authority to search defendant’s person incident to that arrest. As I understand the majority’s analysis, it essentially relies on two factors in finding probable cause — defendant’s visible drug intoxication and his presence in a remote forested area that the deputy suspected was used to “consummate illegal activities such as narcotics.” Because neither of these factors is sufficient to establish probable cause, I respectfully dissent.
As the majority…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. LavenderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- State v. ButkovichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. MoyaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.