Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Blount

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 25, 1996No. 95CR0367; CA A89033Published

1DissentDe Muniz, J.

The majority holds that Deputy Oswald had probable cause to arrest defendant for possession of a controlled substance, and thus the authority to search defendant’s person incident to that arrest. As I understand the majority’s analysis, it essentially relies on two factors in finding probable cause — defendant’s visible drug intoxication and his presence in a remote forested area that the deputy suspected was used to “consummate illegal activities such as narcotics.” Because neither of these factors is sufficient to establish probable cause, I respectfully dissent.

As the majority…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. LavenderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. ButkovichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. State v. MoyaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API