Legal Opinion

Hutson v. S.C. State Ports Authority

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 8, 2010No. 4737PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This is a workers’ compensation case. At issue in this appeal is the award to the claimant, Franklin Hutson, following his attainment of maximum medical improvement (MMI), that limited his recovery to correspond with a thirty-percent loss of use to his back. We affirm in part and remand this matter to the commission for further proceedings. 1

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1997, Hutson began working as a crane operator for the State Ports Authority (SPA). He had extensive prior experience in this line of work and attained an average weekly salary of $1,730. On October 21, 2004, Hutson was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Tiller v. National Health Care CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Fields v. Owens Corning FiberglasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Sellers v. Pinedale Residential CenterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hutson v. South Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. Crane v. Raber's Discount Tire RackSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
  3. Crane v. Raber's Discount Tire RackSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
  4. Thomas Contreras v. St. John's Fire DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API