Legal Opinion
People v. Staszyn
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided February 4, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtAaron F. Goldstein, J.
The charge against the defendant is that the “ premises are used for business contrary to the last issued Certificate of Occupany. Certificate of Occupancy 35823 was issued September 4,1946 for a one-family dwelling: Premises are being used for business,” in violation of section C26-185.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. This section of the code provides inter alia as follows: “It shall be unlawful to make any changes of occupancy or use of any structure if such change is inconsistent with the last issued certificate of occupancy.”
*101Upon the trial the facts were stipulated to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Baddour v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Pratt v. Building Inspector of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Building Inspector of Falmouth v. GingrassMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Tollin v. StateNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. KaufmannAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1985