Legal Opinion
Hoskins v. Dodge County
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided January 31, 2002No. 01-0834PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeininger, J.
¶ 1. Robert Hoskins and several others1 appeal a judgment dismissing their action against Dodge County and the City of Beaver Dam. Hoskins claims the trial court erred in concluding that the County and City were immune from suit for the actions complained of, and accordingly, granting defense motions for summary judgment. We conclude on de novo review that the defendants are entitled to summary judgment. Accordingly, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. Hoskins claims on appeal, among other things, that there are genuine issues of material fact *285that preclude summary judgment. We note, however, that he…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Scarpaci v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Cords v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- M & I First National Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- C.L. v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lodl v. Progressive Northern InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Kiokun v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Umansky v. ABC InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- D.B. ex rel. Recore v. County of Green LakeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
- Hoskins v. Dodge CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.