Legal Opinion

State v. Barrows

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 15, 1992No. 92-053PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Rahel Barrows, who is charged with murder, and his private investigator, E. Guy Paradee, appeal an order holding Paradee in civil contempt for refusing to answer deposition questions about witnesses he had interviewed. The State asked Paradee to reveal if he had spoken to a particular witness and to hand over any statements he had obtained from witnesses listed by the State. Appellants contend the State has no right to these statements and that the request violates the work-produet privilege of Barrows’ counsel and Barrows’ constitutional rights under Chapter I, Article 10 of the Vermont…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. State v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  4. In Re Burlington Bagel Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. F.E.F. v. CameronSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SimoneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. PerezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. DurhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Devonwood Investors, LLC 75 Cherry StreetVermont Superior Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API