Legal Opinion

The First National Bank of Peru v. Parsons

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1891No. 14,681PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.

On and before October 8, 1887, Philip H. Curran and Philip Q. Curran were partners, engaged in business at Peru, each owning a half interest in the business. On that date Philip Q,. Curran died, the firm being at that time indebted to various parties, and among others to the appellant. On the 22d day of October, 1887, the surviving partner executed a chattel mortgage to appellant on a stock of goods belonging to the partnership, to secure said debt due to appellant, the mortgage being duly recorded the same day. On the 25th day of October, 1887, said surviving partner made a general…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. . WhedonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Emerson v. SenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Warner v. Van AlstyneNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  4. Hadley v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State v. MatthewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Burchinell v. KoonColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Havens & Geddes Co. v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Feucht v. Corbett, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API