Legal Opinion

Graham v. Pazos De La Torre

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided May 23, 1991No. 13-90-332-CVPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

Franklin Graham and Delia Rodriguez appeal the judgment from a bench trial declaring void both appellant’s foreclosure sale and subsequent real estate transaction with appellee, Sergio Pazos De La Torre (Pazos). Appellants raise five points of error. We affirm’.

The trial court’s findings of fact are unchallenged. When findings of fact are filed and unchallenged, they occupy the same position and are entitled to the same weight as the unchallenged verdict of a juiy. See McGalliard v. Kuhlmann, 722 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex.1986); Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc., 789 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McGalliard v. KuhlmannTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kalb v. FeuersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Goswami v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Continental Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Katz v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Disco MacHine of Liberal Co. v. Payton, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  3. Sanchez v. Hester, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
  4. Baytown State Bank v. Nimmons, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  5. Paine v. Sealey, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API