Legal Opinion

Blunt v. Gillette

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 2004No. 25578PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.

Kenneth and Sherry Blunt (“Plaintiffs”) sued Richard Gillette (“Defendant”) for breach of contract. In an alternate count, Plaintiffs sought damages from Defendant on a quantum meruit theory. Defendant moved for dismissal of Plaintiffs’ suit based on a res judicata defense, i.e., that a Christian County judgment was a complete bar to this suit. The trial court agreed and entered summary judgment for Defendant pursuant to Rule 74.04. 1 Plaintiffs appeal, charging that the trial court committed reversible error by relying on inadmissible documents as eviden-tiary support…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Chesterfield Village, Inc. v. City of ChesterfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Partney v. ReedMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Williams v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. THF Chesterfield North Development, L.L.C. v. City of ChesterfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lindsay v. Mazzio's Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API