Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Woodard Photographic, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 1, 2006No. 3:05CV07045PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.
This is an employment case. Dwayne Campbell contends Woodard Photographic, Inc. (WPI), Marc Woodard, Roger Wilburn, Corporate Intelligence Consultants, Inc. (CIC), and Paul Johnson used unlawful means to investigate a theft at one of WPI’s locations, and wrongfully terminated him as result of that investigation.
Jurisdiction exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1367.
Pending are defendants’ motions for summary judgment. For the following reasons, those motions will be granted in part and denied in part.
Background
Woodard and Wilburn own WPI, a photography…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Graham A. Peters v. The Lincoln Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Wiles v. Medina Auto PartsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Michigan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- IVY v. WETZALDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021