Allen v. Cherokee Nation Tribal Council
Cherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STACY L. LEEDS, Justice.
Petitioner Lucy Allen is a descendant of individuals listed on the Dawes Commission Rolls as “Cherokee Freedmen.” To become a tribal member under the current legislation, she must prove she is “Cherokee by blood.” She asks this Court to declare 11 C.N.C.A. § 12 unconstitutional because it is more restrictive than the membership criteria set forth in Article 111 of the 1975 Constitution.
Sovereign Immunity
Respondent Cherokee Nation asks this Court to follow the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Santa Clara v. Martinez1 and dismiss this case…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Choctaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Nero v. Cherokee Nation of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Red Bird v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Whitmire v. Cherokee NationUnited States Court of Claims · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cherokee Nation Registrar v. NashCherokee Nation Supreme Court · 2011
- Cherokee Nation Registrar v. NashCherokee Nation Supreme Court · 2011
- In re the Written Protest Against InitiativeCherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal · 2006