Legal Opinion
People v. Kirkorov
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9 [1989]). The defendant’s valid and unrestricted waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 256; People v Stewart, 66 AD3d 924 [2009]; People v Cenname, 66 AD3d 795 [2009]; People v Powell, 60 AD3d 974, 975 [2009]). Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. CennameAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. BarnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. BarnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013