Legal Opinion

Waterview Associates, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1971No. Docket 8901PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.

This case requires construction of an exclusionary provision in a contract of title insurance. Schedule B of plaintiff insured’s policy carries an indorsement which excludes from coverage loss or damage by reason of:

“any matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises.”

This is the so-called “correct survey” exclusion from coverage frequently found in policies of title insurance. See generally, 9 Appleman, Insurance Law & Practice (1970 Cum Supp), § 5209(a), p 11; 45 CJS, Insurance, § 882, p 949. It is on the basis of such an exclusion that the trial court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stewart v. CarletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Gregory v. KnightMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Bower v. EarlMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Cronin v. GoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Walker Rogge, Inc. v. Chelsea Title & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Erickson v. Pure Oil Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Bennett v. Investors Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  4. U. S. Life Title Insurance v. HutsellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Walker Rogge, Inc. v. Chelsea Title & Guar. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API