Waterview Associates, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.
This case requires construction of an exclusionary provision in a contract of title insurance. Schedule B of plaintiff insured’s policy carries an indorsement which excludes from coverage loss or damage by reason of:
“any matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises.”
This is the so-called “correct survey” exclusion from coverage frequently found in policies of title insurance. See generally, 9 Appleman, Insurance Law & Practice (1970 Cum Supp), § 5209(a), p 11; 45 CJS, Insurance, § 882, p 949. It is on the basis of such an exclusion that the trial court…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stewart v. CarletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Gregory v. KnightMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Bower v. EarlMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Cronin v. GoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Walker Rogge, Inc. v. Chelsea Title & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Erickson v. Pure Oil Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Bennett v. Investors Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- U. S. Life Title Insurance v. HutsellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Walker Rogge, Inc. v. Chelsea Title & Guar. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.