Imus v. Huber

AMUNDSON, District Judge. '

The plaintiff sued the defendant for damages to his automobile caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant. Defendant answered denying negligence on his part and counterclaimed for damages to his automobile caused by plaintiff’s alleged negligence.

This action was tried to the court, without a jury, resulting in a judgment for $249 in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant has appealed and asks -for a trial de novo.

The defendant attacks the sufficiency of the evidence to establish, (1) defendant’s negligence; (2) the amount of. damages.

The evidence shows that the…