Legal Opinion

Kauflin v. Turek

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 11, 1955No. 44381PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COIL, Commissioner.

Appellants (Mr. and Mrs. Kauflin) paid respondents (Mr. and Mrs. Turek) $900 at the time they executed an agreement to purchase the Turek farm. The Kauflins sued to recover the $900, averring that respondents “wholly failed to perform their part of” the “Agreement of Sale”. Respondents denied liability for the $900 and counterclaimed, seeking reformation of the sale contract, on the ground of mutual mistake, and specific performance of the reformed agreement. The trial court’s judgment dismissed appellants’ petition and granted respondents specific performance of the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Landau v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Suhre v. BuschSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. Cantrell v. City of CaruthersvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  4. Drake v. HicksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Parkhurst v. Lebanon Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kerrick v. SchoenbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Domyan v. DorninMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. St. Louis County, Mo. v. Oakville DevelopmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. McCrory v. BrinckmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Wolf v. MiravalleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API