Legal Opinion

Domyan v. Dornin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 1961No. 7900PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Presiding Judge.

On June 23, 1959, plaintiffs instituted this action in ejectment by the filing of their petition in conventional form, alleging that, at all times since January 1, 1958, they had been legally entitled to possession of the 194.32-acre farm specifically described in the petition, and that defendants had withheld such possession unlawfully. The prayer of the petition was for possession of the described premises, for $500 damages for unlawful withholding of possession, for monthly rents and profits, and for costs. In their answer, defendants denied all allegations of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Nettleton Bank v. Estate of McGauheySupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. State Ex Rel. Edie v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Cantrell v. City of CaruthersvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Deacon v. City of LadueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Brown v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Allen v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. Domyan v. DorninSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  3. Morrow v. Caloric Appliance CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Moore v. RoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Schell v. SchellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API