Legal Opinion

Forrester & MacGinniss v. Boston & Montana Consol. Copper & Silver Mining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1904No. 1,697PublishedCited by 10 opinions

; Aptpeal from. District Court, Silver Bow County; William Clancy, Judge. Action by James Forrester and John MacGinniss-' against the Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Company and others. Thomas R. Hinds was appointed receiver for the property of the defendant corporation.

Read the full summary

; Aptpeal from. District Court, Silver Bow County; William Clancy, Judge. Action by James Forrester and John MacGinniss-' against the Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Company and others. Thomas R. Hinds was appointed receiver for the property of the defendant corporation. From a judgment fixing the compensation of the said receiver, and from an order denying a motion for a new tidal of the issues involved in the claim for such compensation, defendants appeal. ’ Appeal from the order denying a new trial: Dismissed. Appeal from the judgment:

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mile Urn

This is an appeal from an order of the district court (in the form of a judgment) allowing the receiver- Thomas R. Hinds, $200,000 for compensation for his. services, and $31,116.30 for expenses as such receiver, and from an order denying a. motion for a new trial of the issues involved in the matter of the claim for such compensation and expenses.

Two motions to. dismiss these appeals have been filed — one by the plaintiffs and one by the respondent, Thomas R. Hinds.

*183The appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial is dismissed. There is no sncli appeal known, and no such motion…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Forrester v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Forrester v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State ex rel. Boston & Montana Consol. C. & S. Mining Co. v. Second Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. State ex rel. Heinze v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. McAnrow v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. State Bd. of Medical Examiners v. WeinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Hickey v. Parrot Silver & Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  5. Nowell v. International Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API