Legal Opinion

Feld v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 9, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2012-1789Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KENNETH FELD, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 12-1789 (JDB) FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Kenneth Feld and his insurer, defendant Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company (“FFIC”), have been fighting over attorney’s fees for the better part of a decade. The present fees action stems from a separate personal injury dispute between Feld and his sister, filed in 2008, in which Feld incurred more than $4.5 million in legal fees and costs. FFIC paid over $2 million but refused to fully reimburse him, and Feld…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API