Legal Opinion

Benson v. Benson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1917No. S. F. No. 7581PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. E'. P. Shortall, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for an annulment of marriage which he alleged the two entered into in the state of California on the tenth day of February, 1911. He averred that the defendant was at the time of the marriage a mulatto and by reason of that fact incompetent to enter into the marriage relation with the plaintiff, who is a white person. Substituted service of summons upon defendant was made by publication. On the last day fixed by law for defendant’s appearance certain attorneys appeared and secured on her behalf a ten days’ extension of time in which to plead. No other or further…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vrooman v. Li Po TaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Rehfuss v. RehfussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Wadsworth v. WadsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. McBlain v. McBlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Mulkey v. MulkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Highlands Inn, Inc. v. GurriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Andrews v. Andrews & Andrews, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941
  3. Judson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Judson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API