Legal Opinion

Brigham v. Eglin's of Philadelphia, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1962No. Appeal, No. 254PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

The narrow question this appeal presents is; Whether or not the lower court abused its legal discretion in refusing to remove a judgment of non pros? We conclude it did not.

The action involved sought recover^ of damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered by the plaintiff when struck by an automobile owned by the defendant, Jacqueline Deutsch, and operated by an employee of the defendant, Eglin’s of Philadelphia, Inc. The accident occurred on May 23, 1958. Suit was instituted by the issuance of a summons on July 23, 1958. The defendant Eglin’s ruled plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pinsky v. MasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Baraonfski v. MaloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. Graduate Hospital of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Mazer v. Sargent Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Moore v. George Heebner, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Narducci v. Mason's Discount StoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Gates v. Servicemaster Commercial ServiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API