Legal Opinion

State v. Smart

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 1990No. 8921SC1052PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the trial court improperly denied his motion to dismiss the charge for lack of substantial evidence. Of course when considering a motion to dismiss, the trial judge must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, and the evidence must be such that a jury could reasonably find the essential elements of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Thomas, 65 N.C. App. 539, 309 S.E.2d 564 (1983). Specifically, defendant argues that the State’s case rests on the evidence that defendant’s fingerprint was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BlackwelderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. HarrillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Byrne v. BordeauxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CottonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API