Moye v. Eure
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BALEY, Judge.
The trial court based'the preliminary injunction issued in this case upon the verified complaint filed by the plaintiffs. The defendant maintains that the facts alleged in the complaint even if assumed to be true were insufficient to support a preliminary injunction. We agree and direct that the preliminary injunction be vacated.
The action of the plaintiffs is based on the premise that they are entitled to protection from the defendant who seeks to induce third parties, whether employees or independent contractors, to breach their contract with plaintiffs and enter into contracts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Kadis v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Ballard v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Comfort Spring Corp. v. . BurroughsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Carolina Overall Corp. v. East Carolina Linen Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Peoples Security Life Insurance v. HooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Revere Transducers, Inc. v. Deere & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Island Air, Inc. v. LaBarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Williams v. SappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.