Odom v. State

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge

Appellánt, Kent B. Odom (Odom), appeals his conviction for Intimidation, 1 a Class C felony.

We affirm.

On appeal, Odom presents the following issues which we restate as follows:(1) Whether expert testimony, explaining why a victim set forth in the State’s hypothetical might have recanted a prior allegation regarding a violent incident, was relevant when the alleged victim testified at the defendant’s trial and explained her recantation; 2(2) Whether the probative value of the expert’s testimony was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; and(3) Whether…