Legal Opinion

Port of Edmonds v. Public Employment Relations Commission

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1985No. 50784-8PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

The only question we must resolve in this appeal is whether the mandatory collective bargaining laws set forth in RCW 41.56, and enforced by the Public Employment Relations Commission, apply to employees of the Port of Edmonds.

Defendant Service Employees International Union, Local 120 represents employees of the Port. As authorized by statute, plaintiff Port owns and leases certain property on the Edmonds waterfront. In July 1977 the Port entered into negotiations with the Union. From the outset, the Port had advised the Union as to the possible future leasing of Port facilities. In November…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Roza Irrigation District v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Johnson v. Continental West, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Nucleonics Alliance v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Prante v. Kent School District No. 415Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Public Utility District No. 1 v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ryder v. Port of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. McKinstry Co. v. Aeronautical Machinists, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  4. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. OverdorffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. OverdorffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API