Legal Opinion
In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 2, 1991No. 88 Civ. 3317 (RWS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Arlene Maiorana (“Maiorana”) has moved for reargument of the motion by defendant Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (“OCF”) and others for summary judgment dismissing her claim based on her inability to show that her husband’s colon cancer was more probably than not the product of occupational exposure to asbestos. The motion was granted by opinion dated February 26,1991 (“the Opinion”) 758 F.Supp. 199, and the case was dismissed pursuant to the Opinion on March 4, 1991. OCF has cross-moved for attorneys’ fees and sanctions. For the following reasons, both…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Durso Supermarkets, Inc. v. D'Urso (In Re Durso Supermarkets, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- In Re Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Maiorana v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.