Sargent v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Case Summary
Buchanan, P.J.
This is an appeal by defendant-appellant, Gregory Sargent (Sargent), from a conviction of Entering To Commit A Felony (Theft), claiming insufficient evidence as to identification and intent to commit theft.
We affirm.
FACTS
The facts and evidence most favorable to the State are: At approximately 2:10 P.M. on May 3, 1972, Carol Peterson (Peterson), proprietor of a defunct massage parlor located in a building at 2514 W. 16th Street in Indianapolis, visited the building for a routine security check. Everything appeared to be in order. The doors were locked and none of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tait v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
- Aszman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- FULLER v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Luther v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Farno v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Justice v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Freshwater v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Hahn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Garner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.