Legal Opinion

Freshwater v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 2006No. 27S02-0606-CR-240PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Defendant Otis Freshwater was convicted of burglary. He appeals, contending that the State did not prove one of the essential elements of the crime of burglary: that, when he broke into and entered a building, he did so with the intent to commit theft. Long-standing precedent of this Court dictates that “some fact in evidence must point to an intent to commit a specific felony.” We agree with Freshwater that there was no such evidence here and reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Background

On the night of June 30, 2002, Terry Covey was sitting on his front porch and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Slaton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Timmons v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Justice v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Sargent v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Chappell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. United States v. SnowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Laney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Wendell Brown a/k/a Menes Ankh El v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API