Legal Opinion
Ross v. Fort Worth Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 5, 1930No. 12299PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.
The Fort Worth National Bank recovered a personal judgment against Malcolm S. Ross and W. F. Lowry for the sum of $2,861.67, with interest and costs of suit, and for a foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien upon lots 19 and 20 and the west 10 feet of.lot IS in block 52, Arlington Heights addition to the city of Fort Worth, as against those two defendants and also as against Ara P. Ross, the former wife of Malcolm S. Ross. There was also a judgment in favor of Malcolm S. Ross and W. F. Lowry over against Ara P. Ross for the amount recovered against them by the bank; and a denial of the cross-action…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- W. C. Belcher Land Mortgage Co. v. TaylorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Johnson v. NewmanTexas Supreme Court · 1875
- Stevens v. HamptonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Titus v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1878
- Lipscomb v. Adamson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boots Builders, Inc. v. Hobson Air Conditioning, Inc. (In Re Boots Builders, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- Turner v. Atlanta Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Rabbe v. Federal Land Bank of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942