Stevens v. Hampton
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to Fourth District Court. I. Plaintiff in error is a bona fide purchaser for d reasonable consideration, without notice, and as such ho is entitled to be protected. (Sto. Eq., §§ 165, 881, 409-10; Grisley v. Thayer, 28 Wend. 388 ; James y. Johnson & Morey, 6 Johns. Ch. 417.) H. The deed of trust executed by Hobson to John E. Lockwood, to secure Hoffner, having been recorded first, secured the first lien on the property in controversy.
Read the full summary
Error to Fourth District Court. I. Plaintiff in error is a bona fide purchaser for d reasonable consideration, without notice, and as such ho is entitled to be protected. (Sto. Eq., §§ 165, 881, 409-10; Grisley v. Thayer, 28 Wend. 388 ; James y. Johnson & Morey, 6 Johns. Ch. 417.) H. The deed of trust executed by Hobson to John E. Lockwood, to secure Hoffner, having been recorded first, secured the first lien on the property in controversy. (R. C. 1855, §§ 40-43, ch. 72, p. 364 ; Waldo v. Russell, 5 Mo. 387; Bellas v. McCarty, 10 Watts, 13 ; Vaughan v. Tracy, 22 Mo. 415 ; Beattie v. Butler,…
1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge
The plaintiff brings ejectment for certain land near the city of Hannibal, and both parties claim under one Carmi Hobson, and were purchasers at sales under different deeds of trust executed by him. The one under which the plaintiff claims was given in June, 1859, to Edmund A. Lockwood, as trustee, to secure the plaintiff in certain notes for the purchase money, and, some months after,_ was acknowledged before the said trustee. It *406was not, however, filed for record until March, 1861, and in the meantime — to-wit: on the 28th day of: July, 1860 — said Hobson executed another deed of trust to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shirras & Others v. Caig & MitchelSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Groesbeck v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Wilson v. Traer & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Withers v. BairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
- Beaman v. WhitneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Tavenner v. BarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
- Horbach v. TyrrellNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Pringle v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Boswell v. First National Bank of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.