New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Goldstein
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtBrooks, P.J.
This is an action of contract in which plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $5075 paid to defendant for the loss by theft of an automobile insured by defendant with plaintiff against such risk.
In Count 1 plaintiff seeks to recover on the basis of having paid the loss under a mistake of fact—namely, that it was without knowledge that legal title of the automobile was not in the defendant at the time of insurance.
Count 2 is a common count for money had and received to the use of plaintiff. Both counts are for the same cause of action.
Defendant answered by way of general denial, compliance with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hessen v. Iowa Automobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Womble v. Dubuque Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Shumway v. Home Fire & Marine Insurance Co. of CaliforniaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Cassidy v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Faris v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Meyer v. HookerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1973
- Rossi v. Hartford Fire InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1973