Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 2009No. SD 29262PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DON E. BURRELL, Presiding Judge.

Ernest R. Johnson (“Movant”) appeals from an order denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion to set aside his conviction on a charge of forcible sodomy. See section 566.060. 1 Movant’s amended motion asserts one point of alleged error, claiming both his trial and appellate counsel provided him with ineffective assistance. Because Movant’s claim against his trial counsel is not cognizable under Rule 29.15, and because Movant’s appellate counsel was not deficient in her performance, we affirm the denial.

I., Factual and Procedural Background

Movant’s appeal stems from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  4. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  5. Cook v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McCoy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. McCauley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Fisher v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Christopher Sanders v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Marcus McCoy, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API