Davidson's Case
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Appeal to the Superior Court from a decision of the Industrial Accident Board upon an intervening petition under St. 1911, c. 751, Part III, § 13, of Francis R. Mahoney, asking for the approval by the Industrial Accident Board of the payment of his fee for services as a physician rendered to Carl Davidson, an injured employee and a claimant for compensation under the workmen’s compensation act, during the first two weeks after his injury.
Read the full summary
Appeal to the Superior Court from a decision of the Industrial Accident Board upon an intervening petition under St. 1911, c. 751, Part III, § 13, of Francis R. Mahoney, asking for the approval by the Industrial Accident Board of the payment of his fee for services as a physician rendered to Carl Davidson, an injured employee and a claimant for compensation under the workmen’s compensation act, during the first two weeks after his injury. The decision appealed from was as follows: "The Industrial Accident Board find and decide upon all the evidence that the employer complied with its…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
This is a claim under the workmen’s compensation act for compensation for services rendered by a physician in treating an employee for injuries received by him arising out of and in the course of his employment. The facts disclosed by •the record are that arrangements had been made with a hospital to furnish to employees of the insured, injured in the course of their work, necessary medical and surgical treatment, and that notices to this effect were posted conspicuously in different places *259in the manufactory of the insured employer. The employee in the case at bar immediately…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Panasuk's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Pecott's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
3Cited by2 opinions
- Radil v. Morris & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1919
- Ripley's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918