Legal Opinion
Hardeep Sull v. State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Board of Dental Examiners, et al.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided May 13, 2026No. 2:24-cv-02234Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Hardeep Sull, 4 Case No. 2:24-cv-02234-JAD-NJK Plaintiff, 5 Order v. 6 [Docket No. 94] State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Board of 7 Dental Examiners, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 Pending before the Court is Defendant Nevada State Board of Dental Examiner’s motion 10 to compel discovery. Docket No. 94. The Court has considered Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff’s 11 response,1 and Defendant’s reply. Docket Nos. 94, 100, 103. The Court does not require a hearing. 12 See Local Rule 78-1. 13 I. STANDARDS 14 “[B]road discretion is vested in the trial court…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Laura Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Mann v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.