Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Wangelin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 6, 1890No. 169PublishedCited by 90 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. . The original action was trespass, .brought in a court of the State of Illinois on May 10, 1883, by Lucinda "Wangelin, a citizen of Illinois, against the Louisville and Nashville Eailroad Company, a corporation of Kentucky, and the Southeast and St. Louis Eailway Company,. a corporation of Illinois, for breaking and entering her close, and tearing up and carrying away a railroad switch,…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. . The original action was trespass, .brought in a court of the State of Illinois on May 10, 1883, by Lucinda "Wangelin, a citizen of Illinois, against the Louisville and Nashville Eailroad Company, a corporation of Kentucky, and the Southeast and St. Louis Eailway Company,. a corporation of Illinois, for breaking and entering her close, and tearing up and carrying away a railroad switch, and thereby destroying the connection between a coal mine of the plaintiff and the St. Louis and Southeastern Eailway,…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

It often has been decided that an action brought in a state court against two jointly for a tort cannot be removed by either of them into the Circuit Court of the United States, under the act of March 3, 1875, c. 137, § 2, upon the ground of a separable controversy between the plaintiff and himself, although the defendants have pleaded severally, and the plaintiff might have brought the action against either alone. 18 Stat. 471; Pirie v. Tvedt, 115 U. S. 41;. Sloane v. Anderson, 117 U. S. 275; Plymouth Co. v. Amador & Sacramento Co., 118 U. S. 264; Thorn Wire Hedge Co. v. Fuller, 122 U. S.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pirie v. TvedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Little v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Sloane v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Plymouth Gold Mining Co. v. Amador & Sacramento Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. WillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API