Legal Opinion

Carter v. Norfolk & Western Railway

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1986No. 48497PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHAN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs, Mark Carter and his mother, as next friend and legal guardian responsible for his medical expenses, appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendants, Norfolk and Western Railway and the general manager of its western region, Edward Murry. We reverse and remand for a new trial on the ground that a withdrawal instruction was erroneously given which had a prejudicial effect on the plaintiffs’ case.

On May 15, 1979, sixteen-year-old Mark Carter and three of his friends hopped a ride on Norfolk and Western’s transfer train M05B. When the train…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. BendaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Frye v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  3. Ahnefeld v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Burnam v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  5. Broadview Leasing Co. v. Cape Central Airways, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baldridge v. Kan. City Pub. Sch.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Klaus v. DeenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Bowman v. CSX Transp., Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API