Klaus v. Deen
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PUDLOWSKI, Judge.
The litigation leading to this appeal involves a medical malpractice action brought by appellants, Frederick Klaus (Patient) and his wife Barbara Klaus. The jury returned a verdict for the respondents, C. Joseph Deen, M.D. (Doctor) and C. Joseph Deen, M.D., P.C. On appeal, appellants argue the trial court erred in: (1) Excluding appellants’ expert witness from the courtroom during the testimony of respondents’ expert witness, and (2) giving a withdrawal instruction which withdrew from the jury’s consideration the' fact that Doctor did not order a CT scan prior to performing…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Elfrink v. Burlington Northern RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Earll v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Harris v. WashingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Immekus Ex Rel. Immekus v. QuiggMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- Tompkins v. KusamaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Super v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Brickey v. Concerned Care of the Midwest, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Arnold v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Baldridge v. Kan. City Pub. Sch.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Wicklund v. HandoyoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.