People v. Mindeman
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Calhoun; North, J. George Mindeman was convicted of larency.
1Opinion of the CourtMooke, J.
The respondent was convicted of the larceny of three diamond rings and a set of diamond earrings, the property of Mrs. Murdock, which the people claim were of the value of $2,000 or more. The case is brought here upon exceptions before sentence.
A brief statement of what is claimed by the people is essential to an understanding of the questions involved. Mr. and Mrs. Murdock were the occupants of several rooms in Albion. One of these rooms contained a bed, a desk, some chairs, and a safe. The diamonds which it is claimed were stolen were kept in the safe. Mr. Murdock was interested in a…
2Cited by7 opinions
- People v. PankninMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. TrineMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. LimonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. BurlingameMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- People v. PrattMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.